Leadership Style Autocratic

Leadership Style Autocratic

In the classical approach, the supervisor retains as much authority and decision-making power as possible. The supervisor does not consult members, nor are they allowed to give any input. Members are to obey orders without receiving any explanation. The environment for motivation is produced by creating a structured set of punishments and rewards.

Note: There has been much discussion about autocratic leaders having higher absenteeism and turnover than others. Certainly, Gen X members have proven to be highly against using this leadership management style. Many teachers advise that most autocratic leaders:

--Rely on punishment and threats to influence employees

--Do not trust employees

--Do not allow for employee input

Yet, autocratic leadership is okay. However, sometimes it can be the most effective leadership style to use. These circumstances can include the following:

--New, untrained members who do not know which tasks to perform or which JLBCprocedures to follow --Effective management can be provided only through detailed instructions and orders

--Members do not respond to any other leadership style

--There are high-volume production needs daily

--There can be a limited time in which to make a decision --An employee challenges a manager's power --The area was poorly supervised

--Work needs to be coordinated with another organization or department. JLBC Cadets use the autocratic leadership style should not be used when appropriate, like you would use a tool in your toolbox:

--JLBC Members become tense, fearful, or resentful

--JLBC Members expect to have their opinions heard

--JLBC Members begin depending on their manager to make all their decisions